Beta Digital
StrategyCase study · Anonymised
RFC
Regional Food & Beverage Client
Strategy Project · Food & Beverage · Regional

We built the governance engine for how integration is designed, approved and operated on SAP BTP at scale.

★ Key result
10 patterns
Canonical SAP BTP integration patterns defined
★ Key result
Framework
Strategy, Pattern Catalogue, Specification and Development Standards, Monitoring, Observability, and FinOps Governance
Result
Approach
A repeatable, strategic approach to modernised integration on SAP BTP Integration Suite.

The challenge

Our client — a major multi-brand food and agribusiness manufacturer — set out to modernise its business-critical integration estate onto SAP BTP Integration Suite, moving from legacy SAP Process Orchestration. Those interfaces underpin ordering, manufacturing, dispatch and finance across many brands and sites, so the programme had to keep the business running while building for the future.

A modernisation of this scale needs more than a target platform. It needs a consistent way to decide how every interface is built, supported, retired and costed — and the foresight to keep options open through a long transition where old and new run in parallel. The client engaged us to provide that governance backbone.

What we did

We established a single, repeatable governance framework for SAP integration on BTP — from strategy through to the executable artefacts delivery teams use every day:

  • Architecture standards — a canonical Pattern Catalogue (P1–P10) with decision tree, protocol hierarchy and cross-cutting controls, plus integration-specification and development standards.
  • Operability by design — monitoring & observability and FinOps cost governance defined as design-time obligations, not afterthoughts.
  • Clean migration — a lifecycle-aligned SAP PO decommissioning approach (register, state model, retention timers, evidence packs) and a migration risk & dependency register.
  • A modern support model — a how-and-why runbook framework with a two-artefact model (reusable Known-Error Runbooks + per-interface Interface Support Records), executable Markdown/YAML templates as the single source of truth, and a worked runbook as proof.
  • Safe, AI-ready operations — a guardrail gate that makes unsafe automated actions structurally impossible, and an optional support-utility architecture that is human-operable first, with a phased, evidence-based path to automation.

What it delivered

  • One enterprise answer to which pattern, which protocol, which controls — consistent, forward-compatible interfaces instead of bespoke point-to-point builds.
  • Supportability shifted left — correlation, error handling and observability are now built in, so interfaces are supportable by construction.
  • A clean, auditable retirement path for legacy SAP PO — no orphans, duplicates or lost audit evidence.
  • Cost visibility from day one through embedded FinOps governance.
  • A future-proof, safety-first support model — usable manually now, automation- and AI-ready when the client chooses.
  • A repeatable review model that outlasts the programme and applies to every future BTP initiative.
By the numbers

The full measure of the engagement

5 metrics · 2 key results
10 patternsCanonical SAP BTP integration patterns defined
FrameworkStrategy, Pattern Catalogue, Specification and Development Standards, Monitoring, Observability, and FinOps Governance
ApproachA repeatable, strategic approach to modernised integration on SAP BTP Integration Suite.
Identity federation and environment governance foundations defined
Repeatable review model for future BTP initiatives established
← Back to case studies

Planning a similar engagement?

We help SAP customers on BTP, AWS, and beyond — across Strategy and adjacent capabilities. If this story rhymes with something you're working through, we'd like to hear about it.